Publications

Applied Filters: First Letter Of Title: M Reset
6 Publications

M

Meunier, Sophie, and Kathleen McNamara. Making History: European Integration and Institutional Change at Fifty (The State of the European Union Volume 8). Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2007.
Meunier, Sophie, and Rawi Abdelal. “Managed Globalization: Doctrine, Practice and Promise.” Journal of European Public Policy Vol. 17.No. 3 (2010): pp. 350–367. Print.

Two alternate visions for shaping and explaining the governance of economic globalization have been in competition for the past 20 years: an ad hoc, laissez-faire vision promoted by the United States versus a managed vision relying on multilateral rules and international organizations promoted by the European Union. Although the American vision prevailed in the past decade, the current worldwide crisis gives a new life and legitimacy to the European vision. This essay explores how this European vision, often referred to as ‘managed globalization’, has been conceived and implemented and how the rules that Europe fashioned in trade and finance actually shaped the world economy. In doing so, we highlight the paradox that managed globalization has been a force for liberalization.

Managing Globalization: The EU in International Trade Negotiations.” “.” Journal of Common Market Studies Vol. 45.No. 4 (2007): pp.905–926.
Meunier, Sophie, and Wade Jacoby. “Managing the Global Trade Agenda.” The European Union in a World in Transition: Fit for What Purpose? . N.p., 2009. Print.
Meunier, Sophie, and Sarah Bauerle Danzman. “Mapping the Characteristics of Foreign Investment Screening Mechanisms: The New PRISM Dataset.” International Studies Quarterly n. pag. Print.
Meunier, Sophie, and Christilla Roederer-Rynning. “Missing in Action? France and the Politicization of Trade and Investment Agreements.” Politics and Governance 8.1 (2020): n. pag.
Negotiations for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) between the European Union (EU) and the United States (US) and for the Comprehensive Economic and Trade Agreement (CETA) between the EU and Canada have provoked massive mobilization throughout Europe, both on the streets and online. Yet France, long at the epicenter of anti-globalization and anti-Americanism, has played a surprisingly modest role in the mobilization campaign against these agreements. This article asks why France did not contribute to anti-TTIP mobilization and, more broadly, how patterns of French mobilization over trade have changed over the past two decades. Using comparative-historical analysis, we explore to what extent this puzzling French reaction can be traced to changing attitudes towards the US, agenda-shaping by the French government, and transformations in the venues and techniques of social mobilization. We thus contribute to the growing literature on the politicization of trade agreements and offer insights into the links between domestic and international politics.