Publications

Applied Filters: First Letter Of Title: F Reset
19 Publications

F

Meunier, Sophie, Erik Jones, and R. Daniel Kelemen. “Failing Forward? Crises and Patterns of European Integration.” Journal of European Public Policy 28.10 (2021): 1519–1536.
Meunier, Sophie, Erik Jones, and Daniel Kelemen. “Failing Forward? The Euro Crisis and the Incomplete Nature of European Integration.” Comparative Political Studies (2015): n. pag.
Meunier, Sophie. “A Faustian Bargain or Just a Good Bargain? Chinese Foreign Direct Investment and Politics in Europe.” Asia-Europe Journal 12.1 (2014): 143–158. Print.
Canes-Wrone, Brandice, Lauren Mattioli, and Sophie Meunier. “Foreign Direct Investment Screening and Congressional Backlash Politics in the United States.” British Journal of Politics and International Relations 22.4 (2020): n. pag.
This article examines a particular instance of backlash against economic globalisation – the screening of foreign direct investment in the United States. Although most foreign direct investment is welcome in the United States, specific transactions have aroused suspicion and triggered political backlash by Congress. In fact, successive episodes have reshaped the institutions through which the United States screens foreign direct investment. The recent emergence of China as a foreign investor has posed new political challenges and led to further restrictions. This article explores the circumstances that make congressional backlash to Chinese foreign direct investment more likely, or to use the language of Alter and Zürn in this Special Issue, the ‘triggers’ of congressional backlash. Our findings highlight several patterns, notably that domestic political motives are strongly associated with congressional backlash and that generally the members instigating it do not represent the district in which the investment is located.
Meunier, Sophie. “France and European Integration:Toward a Transnational Polity?.” Political Science Quarterly Vol. 117.No. 1 (2002): pp. 156–157. Print.
Meunier, Sophie. “France and Globalization in 2003.” N.p., 2003. Print.
Meunier, Sophie. “France and the Global Economic Order.” Developments in French Politics 5. Palgrave, 2013. Print.
France and the World, from Chirac to Sarkozy.” “.” Developments in French Politics 4. Palgrave, 2008. Print.
Meunier, Sophie. “France’s Political Whodunit.” Foreign Policy 2002: pp. 72–73. Print.
Meunier, Sophie. “France’s War on Intelligence.” Foreign Policy 2004.
Meunier, Sophie. “France’s Double-Talk on Globalization.” French Politics, Culture and Society Vol. 21.No. 1 (2003): pp. 20–34.
Meunier, Sophie. “Free-Falling France or Free-Trading France?.” French Politics, Culture and Society Vol. 22.No. 1 (2004): pp. 98–107.
Meunier, Sophie, and Philip Gordon. The French Challenge: Adapting to Globalization. Washington, DC: Brookings Institution Press, 2001.

The French Challenge deals with France's effort to adapt to globalization and its consequences for France's economy, cultural identity, domestic politics, and foreign relations. The authors begin by analyzing the structural transformation of the French economy, driven first by liberalization within the European Union and more recently by globalization. By examining a wide variety of possible measures of globalization and liberalization, the authors conclude that the French economy's adaptation has been far reaching and largely successful, even if French leaders prefer to downplay the extent of these changes in response to political pressures and public opinion. They call this adaptation "globalization by stealth."

The authors also examine the relationship between trade, culture, and identity and explain why globalization has rendered the three inseparable. They show how globalization is contributing to the restructuring of the traditional French political spectrum and blurring the traditional differences between left and right. Finally, they explore France's effort to tame globalization—maîtriser la mondialisation—and the possible consequences and lessons of the French stance for the rest of the world.

Meunier, Sophie. “French Cultural Policy and the American Mirror in the Sarkozy Era.” French Politics Vol. 6.No. 1 (2008): pp. 85–93. Print.

Although culture is not at the heart of the policy agenda of the current French administration, it will likely be affected by the Sarkozy revolution. French culture seems to be in a state of crisis, as evidenced both by the end of its ‘rayonnement’ outside of France and by its diminutive focus on the producers instead of the consumers of cultural goods. The options available for reform can, paradoxically given France’s history of policy opposition to American culture, be inspired by what is done in the United States, as is suggested by Fre´de´ ric Martel’s 2006 book De la Culture en Ame´rique. A reform of French cultural policy would have implications both for foreign and for domestic policies.

Meunier, Sophie. “The French Decline?.” The Soap Box Vol. 1.No. 1 (2003): n. pag. Print.
Meunier, Sophie. “The French Don’t Know Their Place (in the Global Economy).” Foreign Affairs. N.p., 2012.
Meunier, Sophie. “The French Exception.” Foreign Affairs Vol. 79.No.4 (2000): pp. 104–116. Print.
Meunier, Sophie. “The French Twist.” Foreign Policy 2007: n. pag. Print.
Meunier, Sophie, and Rozalie Czesana. “From Back Rooms to the Street? A Research Agenda for Explaining Variation in the Public Salience of Trade Policy-Making in Europe.” Journal of European Public Policy 26.12 (2019): n. pag.
After the negotiations for the Transatlantic Trade and Investment Partnership (TTIP) triggered massive public mobilization in the European Union (EU), literature emerged on the novel ‘politicization’ of trade in Europe. To be sure, public salience was high around the TTIP negotiations. However, public salience over EU trade and investment negotiations has varied considerably over the past two decades. The objective of this paper is to stimulate a research agenda explaining such variation. After presenting evidence of variation (over time, across contemporaneous negotiations, and across Member States), we review a diverse set of literature to lay out six complementary explanations for why some trade deals provoke public salience, while others do not: changing nature of trade and investment negotiations; growing discontent with globalization; transformation of the media landscape; institutional changes brought about by the 2009 Lisbon Treaty; the role of the United States; and foreign interference.