Publications

Applied Filters: First Letter Of Title: D Reset
11 Publications

D

Meunier, Sophie. “Daniel Verdier’s Democracy and International Trade: A Book Review Essay.” Comparative Political Studies Vol. 28.No. 1 (1995): pp. 151–155. Print.
Meunier, Sophie, and George Ross. “Democratic Deficit or Democratic Surplus? Comments on the French Referendum.” French Politics and Society Vol. 11.No. 1 (1993): pp. 57–69. Print.
Meunier, Sophie, Alistair Cole, and Vincent Tiberj. Developments in French Politics 5. Palgrave, 2013.
Meunier, Sophie et al. Developments in French Politics 6. MacMillan, 2020.
Meunier, Sophie. “A Disorderly Retreat from Global Governance? US Trade and Investment Policies in the Trump Era.” The Evolving Relationship Between China, the EU and the USA: A New Global Order?. Routledge, 2019.
Meunier, Sophie. “The Distinctiveness of French Anti-Americanism.” Anti-Americanisms in World Politics. Cornell University Press, 2006. Print.
Meunier, Sophie. “Divide and Conquer: China and the Cacophony of Foreign Investment Rules in the EU.” Journal of European Public Policy 21.7 (2014): 996–1016.
Meunier, Sophie. “Divided But United: European Trade Policy Integration and EC-US Agricultural Negotiations in the Uruguay Round..” The European Union in the World Community. Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner, 1998. Print.
Meunier, Sophie. “Do Transatlantic Relations Still Matter?.” Perspectives on Europe Vol. 40.No. 1 (2010): n. pag. Print.
Meunier, Sophie. “The Dog That Did Not Bark: Anti-Americanism and the 2008 Financial Crisis in Europe.” Review of International Political Economy 20.1 (2013): 1–25. Print.
Meunier, Sophie, William Clark, and Erick Duchesne. “Domestic and International Asymmetries in US-EU Trade Negotiations.” International Negotiation Journal Vol. 5.No. 1 (2000): pp. 69–95. Print.

This article studies the determinants of international bargaining power in instances of trade negotiations between the European Union and the United States. The authors’ central hypothesis is that an appraisal of the US–EU trade relationship requires an understanding of the ways in which “domestic” political institutions shape the bargaining behavior of international actors. In particular, this article argues that the frequent EU “successes” in its negotiations with the US are the result of the bargaining power that its unique institutional arrangements grant its negotiators. In order to explain the distributional outcomes of international trade negotiations, the authors explore the “Schelling conjecture” and analyze why it is particularly relevant to the understanding of the unique bargaining power of EU negotiators when they are confronted with their American counterparts. To examine the explanatory power of domestic institutions in episodes of trade negotiations, the article analyzes the US-EC Uruguay Round agricultural negotiations (1986–1993).